Companies aiming to offset carbon emission must back govts in deforestation efforts; Emergent

By Amirtha P S, Desk Reporter
  • Follow author on
Forest
Representational Image

Companies that are aiming to offset their climate-warming emissions can create a huge impact by supporting governments’ initiatives to stop forest destruction rather than planting new trees, an environmental group said.

Recently, the carbon offset credits have started to gain immense demand which is prompting some of the world’s biggest corporations to announce tree-planting initiatives.

But a policy paper authored by Emergent, a US-based non-profit group partnered with organizations including the United Nations Environment Programme, argued that those efforts still fall far short of what is needed.

“Are we trying to solve climate change here or have some nice local impacts we can put on a brochure” Mr. Eron Bloomgarden, Emergent’s executive director, stated. Currently, firms mainly buy carbon credits for relatively small individual projects, many of which focus on tree planting, which makes it easy to tie their investments to specific results.

Emergent said that, with an area of tropical forest the size of New York’s Central Park cleared every 15 minutes, there is much greater value in helping under-resourced governments preserve the existing forests.

Deforestation delivers a double whammy to emissions reduction, removing trees that would have absorbed carbon dioxide from the atmosphere while also releasing carbon the trees already had stored.

However, few effective mechanisms allowing companies to back government efforts are available. Emergent wants to establish a marketplace for carbon offset credits linked to government-led tropical forest conservation initiatives.

According to Ms. Frances Seymour, forests and sustainability expert with the World Resources Institute, nearly, $1 billion in global public finance is available annually to support initiatives of the developing nations which are home to the world’s tropical forests.

Ms. Seymour is also board chair at the Architecture for REDD+ Transactions, an initiative that aims to help large government deforestation programs unlock private investment. Tens of billions of dollars more are needed from the private sector and there was untapped demand in the global carbon market to fill the gap, she added.

“Such demand could incentivize governments to do what only governments can do, actions to protect forests such as recognizing indigenous rights, enforcing the law and regulating commercial forest exploitation more effectively,” Ms. Seymour said.

Mr. Bloomgarden and others, who pointed to the need to ensure programs better benefit the local communities they impact, admit the approach is not perfect. The drivers of deforestation are complex, often entwined with corruption, organized crime and poverty, making them particularly hard to address, said Mr. Giancarlo Raschio, a senior manager at the carbon offset registry Gold Standard.

Related: Global CO2 emissions to surge as only 2% is earmarked for clean energy; IEA


YOU MAY LIKE